<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadview Security Commercials Feed the Alarm Industry&#8217;s Poor Reputation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/2009/09/broadview-security-ads-are-not-realistic.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/2009/09/broadview-security-ads-are-not-realistic.html</link>
	<description>A blog to help keep you up to date on home &#38; community security issues on Vancouver&#039;s Westside as well as the continuing development and growth of Provident Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 06:59:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Gonzales</title>
		<link>http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/2009/09/broadview-security-ads-are-not-realistic.html/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Gonzales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/?p=1044#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>I always see a white guy breaking into a home on the commercials come on I&#039;m hispanic, are you too scared to to show a black or hispanic man breaking in? Al Sharpton scares you more  with his bull horn?Or Jesse Jackson ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always see a white guy breaking into a home on the commercials come on I&#8217;m hispanic, are you too scared to to show a black or hispanic man breaking in? Al Sharpton scares you more  with his bull horn?Or Jesse Jackson ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjagger</title>
		<link>http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/2009/09/broadview-security-ads-are-not-realistic.html/comment-page-1/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>mjagger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/?p=1044#comment-983</guid>
		<description>@j

thanks for your comments. 

Regarding &#039;Instant&#039; arming... while you may have no exit time programmed, and the siren may sound immediately, it will still take about 30 seconds for the cellular call to the central station to happen. While you may be able to receive a call while the alarm is communicating with the central station (because they will be calling your cell or another number), the alarm company will still need time to receive and process that alarm before starting to make the call. That&#039;s also assuming that the cellular call works on the first try. The reality is, no matter how fast it actually is, it will never be as fast as portrayed in those ads.

Also... cellular back-up units are not included in the $99.00 system that the commercials are advertising. They are certainly an extra cost that is not included in the basic package.

Regarding your comments on what the women in those ads do, I think that you are 100% correct. Not only do they run upstairs, rather than trying to get out via a back or side door, they stop to answer the phone and seem to sigh a breath of relief that they are talking to the alarm company. Unless you have a safe room in your home that you are running to, the effort should always be to escape. 

And you&#039;re right... nobody tried to break in, in each case someone did. That&#039;s a big difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@j</p>
<p>thanks for your comments. </p>
<p>Regarding &#8216;Instant&#8217; arming&#8230; while you may have no exit time programmed, and the siren may sound immediately, it will still take about 30 seconds for the cellular call to the central station to happen. While you may be able to receive a call while the alarm is communicating with the central station (because they will be calling your cell or another number), the alarm company will still need time to receive and process that alarm before starting to make the call. That&#8217;s also assuming that the cellular call works on the first try. The reality is, no matter how fast it actually is, it will never be as fast as portrayed in those ads.</p>
<p>Also&#8230; cellular back-up units are not included in the $99.00 system that the commercials are advertising. They are certainly an extra cost that is not included in the basic package.</p>
<p>Regarding your comments on what the women in those ads do, I think that you are 100% correct. Not only do they run upstairs, rather than trying to get out via a back or side door, they stop to answer the phone and seem to sigh a breath of relief that they are talking to the alarm company. Unless you have a safe room in your home that you are running to, the effort should always be to escape. </p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right&#8230; nobody tried to break in, in each case someone did. That&#8217;s a big difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j</title>
		<link>http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/2009/09/broadview-security-ads-are-not-realistic.html/comment-page-1/#comment-982</link>
		<dc:creator>j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/?p=1044#comment-982</guid>
		<description>Hi.

If we&#039;re home, our alarm is always set with &quot;no delay&quot; by pressing 2 4.  It arms instantly, and alarms instantly if any door or window is opened.

Our alarm calls via cellular.  We don&#039;t even have a land line.  Thus, there&#039;s no delay to &quot;seize the line&quot; or waiting for a dial tone.   Also, we can be called while the alarm is still communicating with the monitoring service.

* * *

The terrible mistake I see being made by women in these commercials is retreating further inside their home instead of escaping it.  If a woman has an idea she is the target, she must GET AWAY and run toward other people.  Many of the women in these commercials run upstairs, making escape even more difficult.

* * *

Why do all the women in these commercials say, &quot;Someone just tried to break in.&quot;  when in reality, someone already DID break in successfully?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p>
<p>If we&#8217;re home, our alarm is always set with &#8220;no delay&#8221; by pressing 2 4.  It arms instantly, and alarms instantly if any door or window is opened.</p>
<p>Our alarm calls via cellular.  We don&#8217;t even have a land line.  Thus, there&#8217;s no delay to &#8220;seize the line&#8221; or waiting for a dial tone.   Also, we can be called while the alarm is still communicating with the monitoring service.</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>The terrible mistake I see being made by women in these commercials is retreating further inside their home instead of escaping it.  If a woman has an idea she is the target, she must GET AWAY and run toward other people.  Many of the women in these commercials run upstairs, making escape even more difficult.</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>Why do all the women in these commercials say, &#8220;Someone just tried to break in.&#8221;  when in reality, someone already DID break in successfully?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Community Security : The Provident Blog » Broadview Security Commercials Feed the Alarm Industry’s Poor Reputation -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/2009/09/broadview-security-ads-are-not-realistic.html/comment-page-1/#comment-981</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Community Security : The Provident Blog » Broadview Security Commercials Feed the Alarm Industry’s Poor Reputation -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/?p=1044#comment-981</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mike Jagger. Mike Jagger said: @Prof_K Here&#039;s my take on those ads as someone from the industry... http://bit.ly/LQRaI [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mike Jagger. Mike Jagger said: @Prof_K Here&#39;s my take on those ads as someone from the industry&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/LQRaI" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/LQRaI</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

