<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alarm response rules to change in Seattle&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/2008/12/alarm-response-rules-to-change-in-seattle.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/2008/12/alarm-response-rules-to-change-in-seattle.html</link>
	<description>A blog to help keep you up to date on home &#38; community security issues on Vancouver&#039;s Westside as well as the continuing development and growth of Provident Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Curran</title>
		<link>http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/2008/12/alarm-response-rules-to-change-in-seattle.html/comment-page-1/#comment-768</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentsecurity.ca/blog/?p=367#comment-768</guid>
		<description>The &#039;false alarm&#039; rate is around the 90% mark here in the UK and that&#039;s after years of tweaking and penalising the industry to improve systems and monitoring technology.

The 50+ Police forces operate the following levels of response: -

Level 1 - Immediate response (when available)
Level 3 - No response (unless verified by a witness on-site)

x3 false alarms in a rolling 12-month period will result in a system dropping from Level 1 to Level 3.

Level 2 - Low priority response
This is being phased out by the majority of the Police forces.

The full 46-page ACPO policy may make interesting reading so here&#039;s a link to it: - http://www.nsi.org.uk/PDF/ACPO_April_2008.pdf

I find it hard to believe that the Police here still provide a free response to commercial alarm systems when 9 out of 10 visits are a waste of their time and the tax payers money!

It needs to change and change soon, maybe then we will see more &#039;bobbies on the beat&#039; in residential areas!

Great website by the way...

Regards
Brian Curran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;false alarm&#8217; rate is around the 90% mark here in the UK and that&#8217;s after years of tweaking and penalising the industry to improve systems and monitoring technology.</p>
<p>The 50+ Police forces operate the following levels of response: -</p>
<p>Level 1 &#8211; Immediate response (when available)<br />
Level 3 &#8211; No response (unless verified by a witness on-site)</p>
<p>x3 false alarms in a rolling 12-month period will result in a system dropping from Level 1 to Level 3.</p>
<p>Level 2 &#8211; Low priority response<br />
This is being phased out by the majority of the Police forces.</p>
<p>The full 46-page ACPO policy may make interesting reading so here&#8217;s a link to it: &#8211; <a href="http://www.nsi.org.uk/PDF/ACPO_April_2008.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nsi.org.uk/PDF/ACPO_April_2008.pdf</a></p>
<p>I find it hard to believe that the Police here still provide a free response to commercial alarm systems when 9 out of 10 visits are a waste of their time and the tax payers money!</p>
<p>It needs to change and change soon, maybe then we will see more &#8216;bobbies on the beat&#8217; in residential areas!</p>
<p>Great website by the way&#8230;</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Brian Curran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
